Did your AI actually work?
Here's how you'd know.
Most vendors show you a dashboard. We show you a verdict — and then we let you re-run it.
Most vendors show you a dashboard. We show you a verdict — and then we let you re-run it.
Here's the shape of a verdict on one AI-handled resolution, graded from outside the operator. Picture a contact the dashboard would log green — then the customer reopens it nine days later. Reported cost would read $38. True cost to resolve would land near $214. The fault wouldn't be yours.
On a failure like this, fault would land on the model-vendor — correct inputs, wrong determination, dropped at the handoff. Not your team.
Core methods patent-pending.
Describe a friction pattern wherever AI is handling resolutions, and the Scanner maps it to one of 16 structural fault lines with a preliminary exposure range. It's a hypothesis, not a verdict.
Open the Scanner →No PHI, no integration. The rework multiple is your assumption — shown and editable. The output is a range, not a claim.
Your assumption, not our claim.
Illustrative estimate from your inputs and your chosen rework multiple (industry observations commonly cite 2–5x). This is your assumption, not our claim. Validated against your data on the findings call.
An independent read on your number — not a sales demo. You talk to the person who built the engine, and we have no other operator to protect.
A verdict only counts if a skeptic can reproduce it. That's the standard we hold ourselves to — and the one a vendor's seal or an insurer's badge can't meet.